Show Bible Commentary For A Bible Verse

Click here to show/hide instructions.

Selected Verse: Luke 15:28 - Strong Concordance

Verse	Translation	Text
Lu 15:28	Strong Concordance	And [1161] he was angry [3710], and [2532] would [2309] not [3756] go in [1525]: therefore [3767] came [1831] his [846] father [3962] out [1831], and intreated [3870] him [846].
	King James	And he was angry, and would not go in: therefore came his father out, and intreated him.

Summary Of Commentaries Associated With The Selected Verse

Open All | Close All Open All | Close All

A Commentary, Critical, Practical, and Explanatory on the Old and New Testaments, by Robert Jamieson, A.R. Fausset and David Brown [1882]
came his father out, and entreated him--"Like as a father pitieth his children, so the Lord pitieth them that fear Him" (Psa 103:13). As it is the elder brother who now errs, so it is the same paternal compassion which had fallen on the neck of the younger that comes forth and pleads with the elder.

A Commentary, Critical, Practical, and Explanatory on the Old and New Testaments, by Robert Jamieson, A.R. Fausset and David Brown [1882]

came his father out, and entreated him--"Like as a father pitieth his children, so the Lord pitieth them that fear Him" (Psa 103:13). As it is the elder brother who now errs, so it is the same paternal compassion which had fallen on the neck of the younger that comes forth and pleads with the elder.

Vincent's Word Studies, by Marvin R. Vincent [1886]
He was angry (ὠργίσθη) Not with a mere temporary fit of passion, but, as the word imports, with a deep-seated wrath.

Vincent's Word Studies, by Marvin R. Vincent [1886]

He was angry (ὠργίσθη)

Not with a mere temporary fit of passion, but, as the word imports, with a deep-seated wrath.

Explanatory Notes on the Whole Bible, by John Wesley [1754-65]
He was angry, and would not go in - How natural to us is this kind of resentment!

Explanatory Notes on the Whole Bible, by John Wesley [1754-65]

He was angry, and would not go in - How natural to us is this kind of resentment!

Adam Clarke Commentary on the Whole Bible - Published 1810-1826
He was angry - This refers to the indignation of the scribes and Pharisees, mentioned Luk 15:1, Luk 15:2. In every point of view, the anger of the older son was improper and unreasonable. He had already received his part of the inheritance, see Luk 15:12, and his profligate brother had received no more than what was his just dividend. Besides, what the father had acquired since that division he had a right to dispose of as he pleased, even to give it all to one son; nor did the ancient customs of the Asiatic countries permit the other children to claim any share in such property thus disposed of. The following is an institute of the Gentoo law on this subject: (Code, chap. ii. sect. 9, p. 79:) "If a father gives, by his own choice, land, houses, orchards, and the earning of his own industry, to one of his sons, the other sons shall not receive any share of it." Besides, whatever property the father had acquired after the above division, the son or sons, as the prodigal in the text, could have no claim at all on, according to another institute in the above Asiatic laws, see chap. ii. sect. ii. p. 85, but the father might divide it among those who remained with him: therefore is it said in the text, "Son, thou art Always with me, and All that I have is Thine," Luk 15:31.

Adam Clarke Commentary on the Whole Bible - Published 1810-1826

He was angry - This refers to the indignation of the scribes and Pharisees, mentioned Luk 15:1, Luk 15:2. In every point of view, the anger of the older son was improper and unreasonable. He had already received his part of the inheritance, see Luk 15:12, and his profligate brother had received no more than what was his just dividend. Besides, what the father had acquired since that division he had a right to dispose of as he pleased, even to give it all to one son; nor did the ancient customs of the Asiatic countries permit the other children to claim any share in such property thus disposed of. The following is an institute of the Gentoo law on this subject: (Code, chap. ii. sect. 9, p. 79:) "If a father gives, by his own choice, land, houses, orchards, and the earning of his own industry, to one of his sons, the other sons shall not receive any share of it." Besides, whatever property the father had acquired after the above division, the son or sons, as the prodigal in the text, could have no claim at all on, according to another institute in the above Asiatic laws, see chap. ii. sect. ii. p. 85, but the father might divide it among those who remained with him: therefore is it said in the text, "Son, thou art Always with me, and All that I have is Thine," Luk 15:31.

Top